Another thing has come to mind while thinking about these religions: Nature.
It's funny to me that we have a concept that looks like that. It's like a fish having a concept of water, and somehow seeing that water doesn't exist everywhere in the fish's life.
Wrap your brain around this: why do we have a concept of "outside" as if it's a place you can go? It really just doesn't make sense to me. I guess I'm coming from this perspective . . . can we really escapte nature? Is there anywhere that we can go, even in cities, where nature does not apply where nature does not exist? Why do we think that nature is something or someplace we can visit or observe? I think that the only thing we have ever experienced is nature. It seems foolish to think that you can go to the park to get in touch with nature when nature is what you breath, where you came from, and what you'll return to. I think all you have to do is watch the cracks in the sidewalk, and the little plants that are coming through those.
What I think is that our concept of nature is rooted in ego-centricism. All the nature buffs who want to protect it think that we're destroying nature, they have fundamentally separated human existence from a natural existence. In order to think that we are destroying nature, one must think that nature is supposed to be a certain way, usually a way that makes us healthy and whatnot. But Venus' atmosphere is poisonous, polluted if you will. Yet, no one is saving Venus. So Earth is supposed to have a certain atmosphere? Only if you want to live. And so the ego-centricism becomes apparent. One can easily see the implication, then, that extinction is not natural either.
But I say . . . how do we know? I have been one of the biggest complainers about the destruction of nature. I have hated the big companies and cities, and pollution and people and shit everywhere. Many people litter and disrespect the parks and preserves, and I was angry with them for that. But now I wonder.
Now I think that it's not so much destroying nature that gives me the bad feeling, but instead the issue seems to be interference. Things seem to happen on their own, without our help. What I think the "destruction of nature" really is . . . it's like a finger pointing to our own helplessness. If you think about it, we're not needed. Now I don't mean to be stepping on anybody's religion toes, but just look at things, what niche do we fill in nature? What is so
necessary about our existence? We hunt and keep populations down, our shit fertilizes the Earth (even though we refuse to let it). I'm not saying that we're unnatural, or that we
can't fit in, but it is the mindset itself, the belief that we are separate that creates the pain.
so what we see as destruction of nature, of separation from it (which is really just an illusion) is really just a manifestation of our own horrific belief that we are not needed, and that we really can't control much of anything and we are at the whim of an unpredictable, unfavoring force, that we are separate. We interfer with nature as if we could be separate from it. What we do to the Earth, we do to ourselves. If we treated a person like we treat the Earth it might feel helpless and neglected, not paid attention to . . . which I think is how many of us experience our own lives.
The funniest thing is, this horrific belief isn't even real, it's just a story that we've told each other. Experience changes all things and all beliefs. What experience tells me is that I am home, wherever I go. The Earth is always drawing me into itself.
You're either on the path or not, and yet, you cannot escape the Way.
Death is as natural to the body as taking a shit.
Gassho.